AI OVERSIGHT IS NOT OPTIONAL How often are outputs from AI reviewed or evaluated? Despite widespread messages in popular media that suggest that AI operates independent of human intervention, those responsible for putting 4% 5% AI to work in their organizations across industries recognize that these technologies require ALMOST HOURLY rigorous oversight. In fact, nearly a quarter (23 NEVER percent) of AI adopters review or evaluate AI 16% 18% outputs at least daily. ONCE/ DAILY The data also suggests that companies that have been TWICE more successful with AI tend to have more rigorous A YEAR oversight processes in place. For example, 74 percent of successful companies report that they review their AI output at least weekly, compared with 33 percent of those that are less successful. And 43 percent of successful companies have a process in place for augmenting or overriding questionable results, compared with 28 percent of companies that haven’t yet found success in their AI initiatives. 26% Many believe that despite these positive signs, oversight processes have a long way to go before they catch up AT LEAST 31% with advances in AI technology. “Although we are still in ONCE A the very early phases of AI, the technology is already well MONTH ahead of the marketplace when it comes to the processes WEEKLY and procedures organizations have in place to provide oversight,” says Oliver Schabenberger. “For example, we would be seeing more widespread use of driverless cars if government oversight and automaker-level governance capabilities were able to keep up with the technology itself. The technical capabilities are ahead of our ability to cope with the technology.” 14